When it comes to deciding what matters are worth plunging our nation into war and which are not, our senior leaders owe it to the nation and to the uniformed members to be candid — graphically, if necessary — in telling them what’s at stake and how expensive potential success is likely to be. U.S. citizens and their elected representatives can decide if the risk to blood and treasure is worth it.
Likewise when having to decide whether to continue a war, alter its aims or to close off a campaign that cannot be won at an acceptable price, our senior leaders have an obligation to tell Congress and American people the unvarnished truth and let the people decide what course of action to choose. That is the very essence of civilian control of the military. The American people deserve better than what they’ve gotten from their senior uniformed leaders over the last number of years. Simply telling the truth would be a good start.
Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis who patrolled with troops in eight Afghan provinces last year and returned to America convinced that the war was an unmitigated disaster and senior military commanders were lying to the American public.
- thesomnian likes this
- govtoversight likes this
- theonlythingthateverhas reblogged this from nickturse
- nolandwithoutstones reblogged this from nickturse
- nolandwithoutstones likes this
- mochente reblogged this from nickturse
- jocicausa reblogged this from theamericanbear
- sarahlee310 likes this
- theamericanbear reblogged this from nickturse
- theamericanbear likes this
- thisuserhasnot likes this
- h1ena likes this
- gracethetinyone reblogged this from nickturse
- thepoliticalnotebook likes this
- bostonreview likes this
- nickturse posted this